From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 16, 2010
36 So. 3d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 4D09-2770.

June 16, 2010.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-872 CF.

Andrea Kelly, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant, Andrea Kelly, appeals the trial court's order summarily denying her rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence in which she alleged she was due seventy (70) days credit for time served but was given only forty-seven (47) days credit. The trial court summarily denied the motion stating that Kelly had agreed to be given only forty-seven (47) days credit for time served when she entered a plea agreement with the State. However, the order did not include any record attachments refuting the claim. Seymour v. State, 24 So.3d 794, 794-95 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Therefore, we reverse the trial court's order summarily denying Kelly's rule 3.800(a) motion and remand for the trial court to either attach the portions of the record which refute Kelly's claim or to grant the appropriate relief.

Reversed and remanded.

GROSS, C.J., and STEVENSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Kelly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 16, 2010
36 So. 3d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Kelly v. State

Case Details

Full title:Andrea KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 16, 2010

Citations

36 So. 3d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Murry v. State

The State concedes that the record does not refute Murry's claims. We remand for the trial court either to…