Summary
holding under Pennsylvania law that the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner has no standing to assert creditors' claims against defendants who misrepresented company's assets
Summary of this case from University of Maryland v. Peat Marwick MainOpinion
Argued May 31, 1966
Decided July 7, 1966
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, SAMUEL M. GOLD, J.
Lawrence M. McKenna, Joseph J. Ackell, John A. Sullivan, William S. Busch and Burton K. Katkin for appellants.
Richard Rodwin, Harry Rodwin and Jacques B. Gelin for respondent.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Samuel A. Hirshowitz and George D. Zuckerman of counsel), for Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, amicus curiae.
We agree with the Appellate Division, for the reasons stated by it, that the plaintiff has capacity to sue. However, the complaint fails to allege a valid cause of action and must be dismissed. Under the law of Pennsylvania, which is unquestionably applicable, the liquidator of a defunct insurance company may not sue to recover for damages resulting from fraudulent misrepresentations of the corporation's assets. (See Kintner v. Connolly, 233 Pa. 5; Patterson v. Franklin, 176 Pa. 612; see, also, Wheeler v. American Nat. Bank, 338 S.W.2d 486, 496-498, revd. on other grounds 162 Tex. 502.) It would appear that the plaintiff might be able to state a cause of action for conversion which would be valid under Pennsylvania law. (See Wheeler v. American Nat. Bank, 162 Tex. 502, supra; cf. State Bank of Pittsburg v. Kirk, 216 Pa. 452.) Therefore, leave should be granted to the plaintiff to so amend her complaint. The order shall be reversed, without costs, and the question certified answered in the negative.
Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and KEATING concur in Per Curiam opinion; Judge BERGAN dissents and votes to affirm on the opinion of the Appellate Division.
Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion herein. Question certified answered in the negative.