From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. Metropolitan Cnty. Board of Education

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 12, 1985
755 F.2d 67 (6th Cir. 1985)

Summary

In Kelley, as noted above, the Sixth Circuit noted that the hourly billing rate could be adjusted upward to reflect the contingent nature of the award, "unusual" time limitations and the "undesirability" of the case.

Summary of this case from Hamilton v. Cuyahoga County Welfare Dept.

Opinion

Nos. 83-5175, 83-5243.

February 12, 1985.


[EDITORS' NOTE: THE OPINION OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH CIRCUIT, IN KELLY v. METROPOLITAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, 755 F.2d 67 WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE BOUND VOLUME BECAUSE REHEARING WAS GRANTED AND OPINION VACATED.]


Summaries of

Kelly v. Metropolitan Cnty. Board of Education

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 12, 1985
755 F.2d 67 (6th Cir. 1985)

In Kelley, as noted above, the Sixth Circuit noted that the hourly billing rate could be adjusted upward to reflect the contingent nature of the award, "unusual" time limitations and the "undesirability" of the case.

Summary of this case from Hamilton v. Cuyahoga County Welfare Dept.
Case details for

Kelly v. Metropolitan Cnty. Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:Robert W. KELLEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 1985

Citations

755 F.2d 67 (6th Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Hamilton v. Cuyahoga County Welfare Dept.

It is clear that plaintiff is indeed the prevailing party in this action, having been awarded not only…

Kelley v. Metropolitan County Bd. of Educ

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge; ENGEL, KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, CONTIE, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD and MILBURN, Circuit…