From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelley v. Davis

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 18, 2023
2:22-cv-34-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 18, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-34-DPM

01-18-2023

JOE LOUIS KELLEY PLAINTIFF v. BRANDON DAVIS, Deputy Warden; TONI SHOCKEY, Chaplain; and KEITRICH WADE, Coach, Recreation Supervisor DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Ervin's recommendation as supplemented, Doc. 32, and overrules Kelley's objections, Doc. 33. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). A litigant cannot avoid the statute's requirement of pre-suit exhaustion by filing a motion for injunctive relief. A motion requires a foundation-a case-commencing pleading. The Court properly treated Kelley's motion as his complaint and request for injunctive relief. Motion for summary judgment, Doc. 25, granted. Kelley's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Kelley v. Davis

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 18, 2023
2:22-cv-34-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Kelley v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:JOE LOUIS KELLEY PLAINTIFF v. BRANDON DAVIS, Deputy Warden; TONI SHOCKEY…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 18, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-34-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 18, 2023)