From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keller v. Lindquist

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 9, 2023
22-cv-02060-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-02060-RS (PR)

08-09-2023

JOHN GLEN KELLER, Plaintiff, v. J. LINDQUIST, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RICHARD SEEBORG CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This federal civil rights action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff's original 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 8.) In response, plaintiff filed two first amended complaints. (Dkt. Nos. 10 and 11.) The first alleged claims against prison guards at CSP-Sacramento; the second alleged claims against prison guards at Salinas Valley State Prison. Also, both complaints appeared on blank paper, not on the Court's complaint form. Both complaints were dismissed with leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 13.) Plaintiff was instructed that he had to choose either his claims against the Sacramento defendants or the claims against the Salinas Valley defendants, and that the complaint had to appear on this Court's form.

Plaintiff has not complied with these instructions. He filed two complaints, one for each set of defendants. (Dkt. Nos. 15 and 16.) The complaint against the Salinas Valley defendants does not appear on the Court's form, even though he was sent a blank form to use, and it does not contain any specific factual allegations against any defendant. (Dkt. No. 15.)

The complaint against the Sacramento defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiff filing it in the Eastern District. The complaint against the Salinas Valley defendants (along with the entire suit) is DISMISSED (without prejudice) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The Salinas Valley complaint does not appear on this Court's form and it does not contain any specific allegations against any defendant.

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page; and (ii) be accompanied by an amended complaint that appears on this Court's form and contains specific factual allegations against each named defendant. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Keller v. Lindquist

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 9, 2023
22-cv-02060-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Keller v. Lindquist

Case Details

Full title:JOHN GLEN KELLER, Plaintiff, v. J. LINDQUIST, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 9, 2023

Citations

22-cv-02060-RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2023)