From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keith v. Land

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Dec 1, 1924
2 F.2d 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1924)

Opinion

No. 1679.

Submitted November 13, 1924.

Decided December 1, 1924.

C.C. Bulkley, W.A. Scott, and C.M. Candy, all of Chicago, Ill., and C.D. Davis, of Washington, D.C., for appellants.

G.A. Yanochowski, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.


This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, awarding priority of invention to appellee, Land. The decision is based upon a motion by appellee for judgment, on the ground that appellants, having delayed four years after the grant of the patent in issue to Land before presenting the claims and seeking an interference, are guilty of laches, and therefore estopped from claiming the invention. In the absence of any satisfactory reason for delay, the decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed, on the authority of Chapman v. Wintroath, 252 U.S. 126, 40 S. Ct. 234, 64 L. Ed. 491; In re Fritts, 45 App. D.C. 211; Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co., 264 U.S. 463, 44 S. Ct. 342, 68 L. Ed. 792.


Summaries of

Keith v. Land

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Dec 1, 1924
2 F.2d 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1924)
Case details for

Keith v. Land

Case Details

Full title:Alexander E. KEITH, John Erickson, and Charles J. Erickson, Appellants, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia

Date published: Dec 1, 1924

Citations

2 F.2d 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1924)
55 App. D.C. 398

Citing Cases

Rauen v. Aiken

The Board then refers to the decision in Chapman et al. v. Wintroath, supra; In re Fritts, 45 App. D.C. 211,…