Summary
awarding fees because "the ALJ's decision was based upon both mischaracterizations of the record and conclusions which are contrary to controlling legal authority"
Summary of this case from McPhee v. Soc. Sec. Comm'rOpinion
Case No. 1:14-cv-249
12-21-2015
ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This is a civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff filed a Motion for Attorneys Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (Dkt 19). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on December 1, 2015, recommending that this Court grant in part and deny in part the motion. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt 22) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Attorneys Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (Dkt 19) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff is awarded four thousand, one hundred twelve dollars and fifty cents ($4,112.50), which shall be paid directly to Plaintiff. Dated: December 21, 2015
/s/Janet T. Neff
JANET T. NEFF
United States District Judge