From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keifner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 16, 2005
896 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 4D04-4798.

March 16, 2005.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 04-174 CF.

Carl Keifner, Cocoa, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Hyndman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion alleging that he was improperly sentenced in absentia while incarcerated on unrelated charges, without prejudice to his filing a timely rule 3.850 motion in proper form, in light of Zuluaga v. State, 793 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (claims of improper sentencing in absentia are properly raised in a rule 3.850 motion). We do not have a sufficient record to determine whether, if appellant does file a rule 3.850 motion, it would be successive under rule 3.850(f), and this opinion should not be construed as deciding that issue.

POLEN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Keifner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 16, 2005
896 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Keifner v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carl KEIFNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 16, 2005

Citations

896 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Herndon v. State

We affirm without prejudice to appellant raising issue III in a timely rule 3.850 motion. See Patterson v.…