From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keezio Grp. v. Summer Infant U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 23, 2022
CV 22-3429-DSF-GJS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-3429-DSF-GJS

06-23-2022

KEEZIO GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SUMMER INFANT USA, INC., et al., Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Dale S. Fischer, United States District Judge.

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In this case, Summer Infant (USA), Inc. failed to plead or otherwise defend within the relevant time. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before July 7, 2022 why the claims against the non-appearing defendant should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond to this Order may result in sanctions, including dismissal for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Keezio Grp. v. Summer Infant U.S., Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 23, 2022
CV 22-3429-DSF-GJS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Keezio Grp. v. Summer Infant U.S., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KEEZIO GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SUMMER INFANT USA, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 23, 2022

Citations

CV 22-3429-DSF-GJS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)