From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keenan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 12, 1979
372 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. LL-156.

July 12, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Dorothy H. Pate, J.

Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and A.S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


The evidence supporting this prosecution for possession of marijuana was seized by a police officer who stopped appellant, a white male, while driving his automobile in a black section of Jacksonville, described as a high crime area, late at night. The officer lacked specific, objective facts indicating that appellant was an unlicensed motorist, or that the automobile was unregistered, or that either the vehicle or appellant was subject to seizure for violation of law. Stopping the automobile and detaining appellant in order to check his driver's license was therefore an unreasonable seizure, proscribed by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Delaware v. Prouse, ___ U.S. ___, 99 S.Ct. 1391, 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); Brown v. Texas, ___ U.S. ___, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 60 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). That appellant was previously observed in conversation with a person reputed or known to sell sexual services did not justify the detention.

REVERSED.

MILLS, C.J., and HENRY CLAY MITCHELL, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Keenan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 12, 1979
372 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Keenan v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD RAY KEENAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 12, 1979

Citations

372 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Weisbrod v. Fla. Career Serv. Com'n

The record does not furnish further details of this "routine check", but we observe that the practice of…

State v. Lawson

Our courts have, in the past, consistently rejected similar arguments. See Kearse v. State, 384 So.2d 272…