From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keen v. Kentucky Fried Chicken

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 30, 2012
No. 6:12-cv-159-HO (D. Or. May. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. 6:12-cv-159-HO

05-30-2012

CHARLES DAVID KEEN, Sr., Plaintiffs, v. KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN J118003, DANIEL JACKSON, Owner, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff brings this action asserting violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Defendants moved to dismiss on April 2, 2012. On April 13, 2012, after denying plaintiff's second request for appointment of counsel, the court noted that plaintiff may seek additional time to respond to the motion to dismiss if necessary. As of April 27, 2012, plaintiff had not responded or sought an extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause by May 29, 2012, why the case should not be dismissed and warned plaintiff that a failure to respond would result in the motion dismiss being granted.

Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show casue. For the reasons stated in the motion to dismiss, and because plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case, this action is dismissed.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, defendants' motion to dismiss (#15) is granted. This action is dismissed.

________________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Keen v. Kentucky Fried Chicken

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 30, 2012
No. 6:12-cv-159-HO (D. Or. May. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Keen v. Kentucky Fried Chicken

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES DAVID KEEN, Sr., Plaintiffs, v. KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN J118003…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

No. 6:12-cv-159-HO (D. Or. May. 30, 2012)