From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keeling v. Esurance Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Feb 20, 2013
NO. 10-cv-835-DRH (S.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 10-cv-835-DRH

02-20-2013

LUKUS KEELING, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ESURANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER

HERNDON, Chief Judge

Having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above action has been settled but that additional time is needed to consummate settlement, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice and without costs 60 days from the date of this Order. Should the parties fail to consummate settlement within 60 days, they may petition the Court to delay entry of judgment until a later date. In light of the settlement, the Court DENIES all motions pending in this case as moot and VACATES all court dates in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David R. Herndon

CHIEF JUDGE

U.S. DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Keeling v. Esurance Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Feb 20, 2013
NO. 10-cv-835-DRH (S.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Keeling v. Esurance Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:LUKUS KEELING, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

NO. 10-cv-835-DRH (S.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2013)