Summary
In Taylor v. Keeler, 50 Conn. 346, 349, it is said that "the plaintiff must, in his declaration, give the defendant fair notice of what he claims, and in an action for consequential damages must state the consequences which he claims to have resulted from the wrongful act charged."
Summary of this case from Eldridge v. GormanOpinion
No. 18-1409
06-18-2018
HIEDA A. KEELER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JUDGE WILFORD TAYLOR, JR.; DOUGLASS HERTZ; SHANE A. LACASSE, Magistrate; MELODY COX, CSB; PATRICK GLASS, CSB; HAMPTON-NEWPORT NEWS COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD; CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS; NICOLE NELSON; RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL; SHAISTA ASHAI; JEFF W. ROSEN; ATTORNEY TATIANA MENDEZ; ATTORNEY KARI ELIZABETH JACKSON; ATTORNEY ROMEO GARCIA LUMABAN, JR., Defendants - Appellees, and APRIL CRISP, CSB; MASTER POLICE OFFICE JOHN PARKER, Defendants.
Hieda A. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Foris Simopoulos, Katherine Quinlan Adelfio, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Christopher Michael Midgley, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia; Eileen Ruth Geller, John E. Peterson, Jr., HANCOCK DANIEL JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia; John J. Siegner, III, O'HAGAN MEYER PLLC, Richmond, Virginia; Mary G. Commander, COMMANDER LAW, Norfolk, Virginia; David Drake Hudgins, Debra Schneider Stafford, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00130-AWA-RJK) Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hieda A. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Foris Simopoulos, Katherine Quinlan Adelfio, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Christopher Michael Midgley, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia; Eileen Ruth Geller, John E. Peterson, Jr., HANCOCK DANIEL JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia; John J. Siegner, III, O'HAGAN MEYER PLLC, Richmond, Virginia; Mary G. Commander, COMMANDER LAW, Norfolk, Virginia; David Drake Hudgins, Debra Schneider Stafford, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Hieda A. Keeler seeks to appeal the district court's order granting motions to dismiss filed by 14 of the 16 Defendants in this civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Keeler seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED