"[E]ven if diversity exists and the amount in controversy is satisfied, federal courts in diversity actions do not have jurisdiction to resolve domestic relations claims concerning child custody." Kee v. Hines, No. 17-CV-03780-LB, 2017 WL 7513648, at *3 (N. D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, No. C 17-3780 SBA, 2018 WL 789586 (N. D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2018) (dismissing claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress for lack of jurisdiction because the allegations related to a custody dispute an child-support payments) (citing Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 693-95 (1992)). Here, Plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claims focus on the dispute between Anqui and himself, and related events involving Carr acting in his role as Anqui's divorce attorney.