From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kearney v. Pierson

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Mar 15, 1912
18 Cal.App. 521 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1017.

March 15, 1912.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. T. W. Harris, Judge.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Kearney v. Palmer, ante, p. 517, with the exception stated by the court.

N. Soderberg, for Appellant.

E. K. Taylor, for Respondent.


This case is in all respects similar to the case of Hattie M. Kearney v. John Palmer et al., ante, p. 517, [ 123 P. 611], save that the action is one in ejectment and not to quiet title, and for the same reasons the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 15, 1912.


Summaries of

Kearney v. Pierson

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Mar 15, 1912
18 Cal.App. 521 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912)
Case details for

Kearney v. Pierson

Case Details

Full title:HATTIE M. KEARNEY, Respondent, v. J. W. PIERSON, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District

Date published: Mar 15, 1912

Citations

18 Cal.App. 521 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912)
123 P. 613