From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KEARNEY v. DOCS

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jun 24, 2010
10-CV-6202P (W.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2010)

Opinion

10-CV-6202P.

June 24, 2010


DECISION AND ORDER


Plaintiff has requested appointment of counsel (Docket # 3). There is insufficient information before the Court at this time to make the necessary assessment of plaintiff's claims under the standards promulgated by Hendricks v. Coughlin, 114 F.3d 390, 392 (2d Cir. 1997), and Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986), as issue has yet to be joined. Therefore plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice at this time. 28 U.S.C. § 1654.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

KEARNEY v. DOCS

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jun 24, 2010
10-CV-6202P (W.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2010)
Case details for

KEARNEY v. DOCS

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD KEARNEY, 03A4948, Plaintiff, v. N.Y.S. DOCS; JOHN DOE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Jun 24, 2010

Citations

10-CV-6202P (W.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2010)