From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaywood v. Pumillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 2, 1999
264 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

August 2, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff's affidavit, along with the affidavit of his chiropractor, created an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a medically-determined injury which prevented him from performing substantially all of the material acts constituting his usual and customary daily activities during at least 90 out of the first 180 days following the accident ( see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Greco v. Five Five Garage Corp., 123 A.D.2d 422).

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kaywood v. Pumillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 2, 1999
264 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Kaywood v. Pumillo

Case Details

Full title:NABEEH KAYWOOD, Respondent, v. STEVEN PUMILLO, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 2, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
693 N.Y.S.2d 441

Citing Cases

Shifren v. Scheiner

The Supreme Court erred in granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on…

Connors v. Center City, Inc.

ons. However, this proof was insufficient to establish that the injured plaintiff did not sustain a…