Kay v. City of Norfolk

Full title: DIANNA L. KAY v. CITY OF NORFOLK

Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Mar 2, 2004

Record No. 2983-03-1 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2004)

Opinion

Record No. 2983-03-1.

March 2, 2004.

Appeal from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission.

(Andrew M. Sacks; Keith J. Leonard; Sacks Sacks, on brief), for appellant.

(Joan E. Mahoney, Assistant City Attorney, on brief), for appellee.

Present: Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton.

MEMORANDUM OPINION^_

_ Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

PER CURIAM.

Dianna L. Kay appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission denying her claim for benefits because she failed to prove she sustained an injury by accident arising out of her employment on November 7, 2001. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Kay v. Norfolk (City of) Police Dep't, VWC File No. 207-63-37 (Oct. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.