stating that a challenged LIRAB finding played no “meaningful role” in LIRAB's determination regarding claimant's injury and thus any potential error was harmless
Summary of this case from Boydstun v. Polynesian Cultural Ctr.No. 29295.
October 19, 2009.
Summary Dispositional Orders, Affirmed.
stating that a challenged LIRAB finding played no “meaningful role” in LIRAB's determination regarding claimant's injury and thus any potential error was harmless
Summary of this case from Boydstun v. Polynesian Cultural Ctr.In Kawamoto, we rejected the employer's contention that an issue needed to be specifically identified in the pretrial order for the Board to address it. Kawamoto, SDO at 4-5.
Summary of this case from Arruda v. Willocks Constr. Corp.Full title:Kawamoto v. NHC. Inc
Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Date published: Oct 19, 2009
Thus, the Family Court erred when it found that Father failed to provide pay stubs. The error was harmless,…
Boydstun v. Polynesian Cultural Ctr.Therefore, any alleged error is harmless.See, e.g., Kahawaiolaa v. United Airlines, Inc., 2012 WL 54497, at…