From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kavanaugh v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Dec 5, 2023
No. CV-19-04771-PHX-MTL (D. Ariz. Dec. 5, 2023)

Opinion

CV-19-04771-PHX-MTL

12-05-2023

Robin R Kavanaugh, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

Michael T. Liburdi United Slates District Judge

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Robin R. Kavanaugh's Counsel's Motion for Attorney's Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). (Doc. 27.) Section 406(b)(1) authorizes the recovery of reasonable attorney fees from the award of past-due benefits:

Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment, and the Commissioner of Social Security may, notwithstanding the provisions of section 405(i) of this title, but subject to subsection (d) of this section, certify the amount of such fee for payment to such attorney out of, and not in addition to, the amount of such past-due benefits.
42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A).

Plaintiff prevailed in an appear to this Court from the administrative law judge's decision denying benefits. The Social Security Administration calculated Plaintiff's past- due benefits as $138,164.00. It withheld $34,541.00, representing 25 percent of the past-due benefits, to pay for potential attorney fees.

Having successfully litigated this case, Plaintiff's Counsel seeks an award of $34,541.00 in fees from Plaintiff's recovery. The Court previously awarded Plaintiff $5,500.00 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (Doc 26.) Plaintiff's Counsel acknowledges that a § 406(b)(1) fee award must be offset by the previously awarded EAJA attorney fee.

The Court finds that the representation agreement between Plaintiff and his Counsel represents a lawful contingency fee agreement. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002). The Court further finds that the requested fee award satisfies the statutory cap of 25 percent of the total past-due benefits. The requested fee award is reasonable given the contingent nature of this case, the complexity involved, the work performed, the success obtained, and Counsel's experience. An award of attorney fees under § 406(b)(1) is appropriate.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 27) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Counsel is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $34,541.00 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Counsel shall reimburse Plaintiff in the amount of $5,500.00, representing the EAJA fees previously awarded.


Summaries of

Kavanaugh v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Dec 5, 2023
No. CV-19-04771-PHX-MTL (D. Ariz. Dec. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Kavanaugh v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:Robin R Kavanaugh, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Dec 5, 2023

Citations

No. CV-19-04771-PHX-MTL (D. Ariz. Dec. 5, 2023)