From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaur v. Biggs

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Aug 20, 2013
2:10-cv-03297-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2013)

Opinion

          STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, DAVID J. KLINE Director, District Court Section, ELIZABETH J. STEVENS, Assistant Director, District Court Section, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., counsel for Defendants.


          ORDER

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         The Court is in receipt of the parties' Joint Stipulation to Hold Case in Abeyance Pending Administrative Proceedings. (ECF No. 38.) Pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

         1. This case will be held in abeyance until February 20, 2014.

         2. The Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order of January 4, 2013 is VACATED.

         3. The parties are directed to submit a Joint Status Report on or before January 27, 2014.

         4. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29) and Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30) are DENIED without prejudice to refiling at such future time as may be appropriate. Accordingly, the hearing on the parties' motions, currently set for August 22, 2013, is VACATED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kaur v. Biggs

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Aug 20, 2013
2:10-cv-03297-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Kaur v. Biggs

Case Details

Full title:HARJEET KAUR, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL C. BIGGS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2013

Citations

2:10-cv-03297-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2013)