From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaul v. Intercontinental Exch.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 6, 2021
21-CV-6992 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-6992 (JPO)

10-06-2021

M.D. RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge.

Pro se plaintiffs' requests for default at Docket Numbers 21, 23, and 27 are denied without prejudice because plaintiffs have not complied with the Clerk of Court's requirements for such requests or filed any proof of service for the amended complaint. The letter motions for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint at Docket Numbers 33 and 34 are granted. TD Bank shall respond to the amended complaint on or before November 1, 2021. GEICO Insurance Company and Max Gershenoff, Esq. shall respond to the amended complaint on or before November 11, 2021. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this order to the pro se plaintiffs in this matter.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kaul v. Intercontinental Exch.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 6, 2021
21-CV-6992 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Kaul v. Intercontinental Exch.

Case Details

Full title:M.D. RICHARD ARJUN KAUL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 6, 2021

Citations

21-CV-6992 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2021)