From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaufman v. Western Sugar Cooperative Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Oct 15, 2007
7:06CV5017 (D. Neb. Oct. 15, 2007)

Opinion

7:06CV5017.

October 15, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on defendant's motion in limine (Filing No. 103) which seeks to exclude evidence in four different areas: (1) of any incidents of discrimination more than three hundred days prior to August 30, 2004; (2) testimony or documentation for events or alleged discrimination subsequent to August 30, 2004; (3) preventing plaintiff or any witness from testifying or providing documentation with regard to defendant's financial condition; and (4) preventing plaintiff or any witness from providing documentation with regard to the DUI conviction of John Araujo in 2003.

The Court has reviewed the motion as well as plaintiff's response and finds as follows:

IT IS ORDERED:

1) The requests in Paragraphs 2 and 3 of defendant's motion in limine are denied.

2) The request in Paragraph 4 is granted. The Court notes that plaintiff concedes that this evidence is not relevant.

3) With respect to the matters covered by Paragraph 1, the Court reserves ruling until the time of trial.


Summaries of

Kaufman v. Western Sugar Cooperative Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Oct 15, 2007
7:06CV5017 (D. Neb. Oct. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Kaufman v. Western Sugar Cooperative Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STEVE KAUFMAN, Plaintiff, v. THE WESTERN SUGAR COOPERATIVE INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Oct 15, 2007

Citations

7:06CV5017 (D. Neb. Oct. 15, 2007)