From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kauder v. Lautman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 4, 1934
172 A. 565 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Decided March 4th, 1934.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Mr. David Goldstein, for the appellant.

Mr. Isaiah Matlack, for the respondents.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 114 N.J. Eq. 197. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 10.

For reversal — PARKER, LLOYD, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, JJ. 5.


Summaries of

Kauder v. Lautman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 4, 1934
172 A. 565 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Kauder v. Lautman

Case Details

Full title:LEO KAUDER, complainant-appellant, v. SOLOMON LAUTMAN et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Mar 4, 1934

Citations

172 A. 565 (N.J. 1934)
172 A. 565

Citing Cases

Schenck v. Davis

The proofs in this case do not convince us that Mr. Davis, Sr., discharged that burden. Compare 7 Corp.…