From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ka'u Sunshine LLC v. Unknown Heirs of Kahaku

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Oct 10, 2019
NO. CAAP-19-0000345 (Haw. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2019)

Opinion

NO. CAAP-19-0000345

10-10-2019

KA'U SUNSHINE LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Unknown heirs or assigns of KAHAKU (k), KANAKALAUAI (w), PAPALIMU (w), KAPANA (k), also known as W. KAPANA (k), H. AKONA, MALAKINI (w), also known as MALAKINI APIKI (w) and MALAKINI ENAENA (w), and ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, Defendants-Appellees, and ANDERSON X. LINDSEY, Real Party In Interest-Appellant


NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
(CIVIL NO. 17-1-358) ORDER DENYING OCTOBER 4, 2019 HRAP RULE 40 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Fujise and Leonard, JJ.)

Upon review of (1) the September 26, 2019 order dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction and dismissing all pending motions as moot, (2) Defendant-Appellant Anderson Lindsey's (Lindsey) October 4, 2019 motion for clarification of the September 26, 2019 dismissal order, and (3) the record, we deem Lindsey's October 4, 2019 motion to be, in substance, a motion for reconsideration of the September 26, 2019 dismissal order pursuant to Rule 40 of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP). To the extent that Lindsey seeks clarification of the September 26, 2019 dismissal order, we clarify that we dismissed Lindsey's entire appeal in CAAP-19-0000345 for lack of appellate jurisdiction because his notice of appeal was untimely under HRAP Rule 4(a)(1). Consequently, we also dismissed as moot any and all pending motions in CAAP-19-0000345, such as Lindsey's September 12, 2019 motion for reconsideration of the September 4, 2019 default against Lindsey for failing to file his HRAP Rule 12.1 statement of jurisdiction and HRAP Rule 28(b) opening brief. As a result, Lindsey's appeal has been concluded, and it is now closed. To the extent that Lindsey seeks reconsideration of the September 26, 2019 dismissal order, we conclude that we did not overlook or misapprehend any points of law or fact when we entered the September 26, 2019 dismissal order.

Therefore, IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that Lindsey's October 4, 2019 HRAP Rule 40 motion for reconsideration of the September 26, 2019 dismissal order is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 10, 2019.

/s/

Chief Judge

/s/

Associate Judge

/s/

Associate Judge


Summaries of

Ka'u Sunshine LLC v. Unknown Heirs of Kahaku

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Oct 10, 2019
NO. CAAP-19-0000345 (Haw. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2019)
Case details for

Ka'u Sunshine LLC v. Unknown Heirs of Kahaku

Case Details

Full title:KA'U SUNSHINE LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Unknown heirs or assigns of…

Court:INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Oct 10, 2019

Citations

NO. CAAP-19-0000345 (Haw. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2019)