From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katzenberger v. Raph

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Jun 7, 2012
814 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. 2012)

Opinion

No. A12–0059.

2012-06-7

Bradley J. KATZENBERGER, Relator, v. Kelly RAPH d/b/a Raph Construction and Acuity Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.

Jacob Robert Jagdfeld, Johnson Becker PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for relator. Christine L. Tuft, Aaron D. Schmidt, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.


Jacob Robert Jagdfeld, Johnson Becker PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for relator. Christine L. Tuft, Aaron D. Schmidt, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.
Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on December 14, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view”, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/

Helen M. Meyer

Associate Justice


Summaries of

Katzenberger v. Raph

Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Jun 7, 2012
814 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. 2012)
Case details for

Katzenberger v. Raph

Case Details

Full title:Bradley J. KATZENBERGER, Relator, v. Kelly RAPH d/b/a Raph Construction…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

814 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. 2012)