From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katz v. Newmark Co. Real Estate, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1994
204 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 16, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision which granted the branch of the motion by the defendant Barry Gosin which was to change the venue of the action from Kings County to New York County, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the appellant.

The defendant Barry Gosin was required to serve a demand for change of venue as of right on or before December 17, 1991, the date he served an amended answer to the amended complaint (see, CPLR 511 [a]). Therefore, Gosin's subsequent demand for change of venue, dated May 20, 1992, was untimely and the branch of his cross motion which was to change the venue of the action from Kings County to New York County should have been denied.

We further find that the branch of the plaintiff's cross motion which was to strike the defendants' answer is without merit and was properly denied. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Katz v. Newmark Co. Real Estate, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1994
204 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Katz v. Newmark Co. Real Estate, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HIRSCH KATZ, Appellant, v. NEWMARK CO. REAL ESTATE, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 201