From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Katz v. McVeigh

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Sep 29, 2010
Civil No. 10-cv-178-PB (D.N.H. Sep. 29, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-cv-178-PB.

September 29, 2010


ORDER


To date, the Court has no record that service of the complaint has been effectuated in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Additionally, counsel for the plaintiff has been granted ample time to comply with the Clerk's May 6, 2010 Order regarding visiting attorneys and, to date, has failed to take the necessary steps to be permitted to practice before this court.

For the above reasons, this case is herewith dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

September 29, 2010


Summaries of

Katz v. McVeigh

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Sep 29, 2010
Civil No. 10-cv-178-PB (D.N.H. Sep. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Katz v. McVeigh

Case Details

Full title:Elena Katz, et al v. Brian McVeigh, et al

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Sep 29, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-cv-178-PB (D.N.H. Sep. 29, 2010)

Citing Cases

Katz v. McVeigh

• the same magistrate judge subsequently denied Piccone pro hac vice admission in a different case, finding…

Doe v. Briggs

In the court's view, these are not the actions of an attorney who simply wishes to assist an individual pro…