Opinion
No. 07-5295.
Filed On: February 26, 2008.
BEFORE: Randolph, Tatel, and Garland, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto; the motion for sanctions; the motion for default judgment; the motion to correct the record; the motion for production of documents and the supplement thereto; the motion to transfer; and the motion for the appointment of a guardian, it is.
ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987). The district court properly denied appellant's motion to intervene pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a)(2) and (b)(2). See Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Norton, 322 F.3d 728, 732 (D.C. Cir. 2003); EEOC v. National Children's Ctr., Inc., 146 F.3d 1042, 1046 (D.C. Cir. 1998). It is.
FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining motions be denied.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed.R.App.P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.