From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kasarian Unempl. Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 22, 1961
168 A.2d 804 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1961)

Opinion

March 13, 1961.

March 22, 1961.

Unemployment Compensation — Appeals — Timeliness — Decision of bureau — Unemployment Compensation Law.

Under § 501(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, where a claimant has failed, without excuse, to appeal from the decision of the bureau within the time prescribed, the referee is without jurisdiction to consider the claim on the merits, and, on appeal from the decision of the board affirming the decision of the referee dismissing the appeal, the appellate court has no alternative other than to affirm the decision of the board.

Before ERVIN, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, and FLOOD, JJ. (RHODES, P.J., absent).

Appeal, No. 11, March T., 1961, by claimant, from decision of Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. B-56466, in re claim of Erwand Kasarian. Decision affirmed.

Erwand Kasarian, appellant, in propria persona, submitted a brief.

Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with him Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.


Argued March 13, 1961.


On April 14, 1959, following a valid separation from his last employment, Erwand Kasarian filed an application for unemployment compensation benefits. On September 24, 1959, the Bureau of Employment Security mailed to Kasarian at his last known post office address a revised benefit rate determination notice that he was ineligible for benefits because of insufficient base year earnings. This notice was accompanied by a letter from the manager of the local employment office informing Kasarian that, if he disagreed with the determination, he had the right to file an appeal on or before October 4, 1959. There is nothing in the record to indicate that Kasarian did not receive this notice and accompanying letter, nor does he contend otherwise. Kasarian did not file an appeal from the Bureau's revised determination until October 30, 1959. The Referee dismissed the appeal on the ground that it was not timely filed. The Board of Review affirmed the decision of the Referee, and the instant appeal to the Superior Court followed.

Section 501(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law provides that the determination of the Bureau shall be final unless claimant files an appeal "within ten (10) calendar days after such notice was delivered to him personally, or was mailed to his last known post office address". Claimant has offered no excuse whatever for his delay. Under the circumstances, the Referee was without jurisdiction to consider the claim on the merits. We have no alternative other than to affirm the decision of the Board. See Banton Unemployment Compensation Case, 193 Pa. Super. 356, 165 A.2d 90.

Act of December 5, 1936, P.L. [1937] 2897, 43 P.S. 751 et seq.

Decision affirmed.


Summaries of

Kasarian Unempl. Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 22, 1961
168 A.2d 804 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1961)
Case details for

Kasarian Unempl. Compensation Case

Case Details

Full title:Kasarian Unemployment Compensation Case

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 22, 1961

Citations

168 A.2d 804 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1961)
168 A.2d 804

Citing Cases

Massey Unempl. Compensation Case

Claimant may not here complain about his failure, if such there was, to make provision for his mail to be…