From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karr v. Brant Lake Camp, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1999
261 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Summary

In Karr, this Court held that the defendant camp had unreasonably increased risks where adult camp counselors were playing baseball with 11-year-old boys, and a ball thrown hard by an adult injured a camper.

Summary of this case from Fintzi v. New Jersey Ymha-Ywha Camps

Opinion

May 27, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.).


The infant plaintiff was injured during a baseball game, organized for 11 year old boys, when an adult counselor, playing in the position of catcher, threw the ball "hard" at plaintiff. Plaintiff was unable to handle the ball, which struck him in the face. Summary judgment on the basis of an assumption of risk was properly denied.

Voluntary participants in a sporting activity assume the risks to which their roles expose them but not risks that are "`unreasonably increased'" (Benitez v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 73 N.Y.2d 650, 658). Thus, notwithstanding a player's assumption of the risks inherent in playing any sport, school districts, athletic councils and other organizers of children's sporting activities remain under a duty to "exercise ordinary reasonable care" to protect the infant participants "from * * * unreasonably increased risks" (supra, at 658). In the case at bar, an issue of fact, is raised as to whether the active participation of an adult, physically larger and more skillful, enhanced the risks associated with the sport as played by 11 year old boys (see, Mauner v. Feinstein, 213 A.D.2d 383).

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.


Summaries of

Karr v. Brant Lake Camp, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1999
261 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

In Karr, this Court held that the defendant camp had unreasonably increased risks where adult camp counselors were playing baseball with 11-year-old boys, and a ball thrown hard by an adult injured a camper.

Summary of this case from Fintzi v. New Jersey Ymha-Ywha Camps
Case details for

Karr v. Brant Lake Camp, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GAIL B. KARR, Respondent, v. BRANT LAKE CAMP, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 27, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 427

Citing Cases

Zmitrowitz v. Roman Cath. Diocese of Syracuse

Thus, the doctrine of primary assumption of risk will not act as a complete bar to recovery where the injury…

Vailes v. Nassau Cty. Police Activity League

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment…