From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karolyn v. Ribolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 2008
49 A.D.3d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-06532.

March 25, 2008.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Irina Kravis appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), dated March 22, 2007, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Gannon, Rosenfarb Moskowitz, New York, N.Y. (James A. Aldag and Nicholas Gisonda of counsel), for appellant.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Miller, Covello and McCarthy, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In support of her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her, the defendant Irina Kravis made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). However, in opposition to the motion, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact ( see id.; Fontecchio v Esposito, 108 AD2d 780). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the defendant's motion.


Summaries of

Karolyn v. Ribolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 2008
49 A.D.3d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Karolyn v. Ribolo

Case Details

Full title:KAROLYN KENEDICS, Respondent, v. IGOR RIBOLO, Defendant, and IRINA KRAVIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 2008

Citations

49 A.D.3d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2796
853 N.Y.S.2d 903