From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karl v. Bizar

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 20, 2009
Civil Action 2:09-CV-34 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 20, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:09-CV-34.

July 20, 2009


ORDER


On June 30, 2009, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand Action to Franklin County Common Pleas Court, Doc. No. 10, be denied. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand Action to Franklin County Common Pleas Court, Doc. No. 10, is hereby DENIED.


Summaries of

Karl v. Bizar

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 20, 2009
Civil Action 2:09-CV-34 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 20, 2009)
Case details for

Karl v. Bizar

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE M. KARL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GORDON BIZAR, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 20, 2009

Citations

Civil Action 2:09-CV-34 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 20, 2009)

Citing Cases

Sunkin v. Hunter Eng'g Co.

Doc. 15, p. 3; see Ohio Civ. R. 8(A). Such a generic pleading is not dispositive in determining the amount in…