From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karl A. Kandell Associates v. Urbanek

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 31, 1980
391 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 79-2604.

December 31, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Martin County, C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, J.

Joel S. Wadsworth of Wadsworth Carnes, Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.

Walter M. Meginniss of Crary, Buchanan Meginniss, Chartered, Stuart, for appellees.


Appellant filed a notice of appeal over two months after entry of the written order which he wants us to review. We do not have jurisdiction unless an appropriate motion for rehearing tolled the time for filing a notice of appeal. Appellant relies upon a motion for rehearing filed after the court's oral ruling but before entry of a written order. We dismiss the appeal. See Tri-State Systems, Inc. v. Seminole County, 302 So.2d 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

MOORE, BERANEK and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Karl A. Kandell Associates v. Urbanek

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 31, 1980
391 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Karl A. Kandell Associates v. Urbanek

Case Details

Full title:KARL A. KANDELL ASSOCIATES, INC., AND KARL A. KANDELL, INDIVIDUALLY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 31, 1980

Citations

391 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

In re Estate of Zimbrick

In order to rule upon appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal, we must determine the legal effect of a…

Fla. Coast Bank of Pompano v. Kimmitt

There is a procedural aspect to this case which, I think, merits further discussion. It involves the legal…