From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karim v. Raju

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 22, 2021
193 A.D.3d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

13657 Index No. 100720/14 Case No. 2020-03078

04-22-2021

In the Matter of Syed Aftab KARIM, M.D., F.A.A.N.S., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ramanathan RAJU, M.D., et al., Respondents-Respondents.

Eisenberg & Schnell LLP, New York (Herbert Eisenberg and Julian R. Birnbaum of counsel), for appellant. Garfunkel Wild, P.C., Great Neck (Leonard Rosenberg of counsel), for respondents.


Eisenberg & Schnell LLP, New York (Herbert Eisenberg and Julian R. Birnbaum of counsel), for appellant.

Garfunkel Wild, P.C., Great Neck (Leonard Rosenberg of counsel), for respondents.

Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Singh, Moulton, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Borrok, J.), entered January 21, 2020, which, inter alia, granted defendants' cross motion for sanctions, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the cross motion denied.

Plaintiff's motion, while ultimately unsuccessful, was not frivolous and therefore did not warrant sanctions ( 22 NYCRR § 130–1.1 [c][1], [2]).


Summaries of

Karim v. Raju

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 22, 2021
193 A.D.3d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Karim v. Raju

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Syed Aftab Karim, M.D., F.A.A.N.S., Petitioner-Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 22, 2021

Citations

193 A.D.3d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 2461
143 N.Y.S.3d 182