From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Karban v. Baltierra

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Feb 13, 2023
No. CV-19-04377-PHX-DWL (D. Ariz. Feb. 13, 2023)

Opinion

CV-19-04377-PHX-DWL

02-13-2023

Stephen Frank Karban, Plaintiff, v. Vivian Baltierra, et al., Defendants.


WO

ORDER

Dominic W. Lanza United States District Judge

Defendant has filed a response (Doc. 223) to Plaintiff's subpoena request (Doc. 217), which the Court granted without full briefing (Doc. 218). The Court's November 28, 2022 order requiring Plaintiff to establish that there is a reasonable basis for issuing the subpoenas stated that the response and reply times would be those set by the local rules and that the response “must indicate whether Defendants oppose any proposed witness and whether Defendants will produce any requested non-inmate witness without a subpoena.” (Doc. 202.) Because the Court's order granting the subpoena request issued without the benefit of the contemplated response and reply briefs, the Court will vacate that order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Court's January 31, 2023 order (Doc. 218) is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a reply brief by February 21, 2023.


Summaries of

Karban v. Baltierra

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Feb 13, 2023
No. CV-19-04377-PHX-DWL (D. Ariz. Feb. 13, 2023)
Case details for

Karban v. Baltierra

Case Details

Full title:Stephen Frank Karban, Plaintiff, v. Vivian Baltierra, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Feb 13, 2023

Citations

No. CV-19-04377-PHX-DWL (D. Ariz. Feb. 13, 2023)