From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kapsis v. Peragine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 2004
8 A.D.3d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-04991.

Decided June 14, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for defamation, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), entered April 22, 2003, as, upon reargument, adhered to so much of a prior determination in an order of the same court dated January 29, 2003, as conditioned the granting of the defendants' motion, inter alia, to vacate their default in answering the complaint upon their payment of the sum of $1,000 to the plaintiff.

I. Leonard Feigenbaum, Plainview, N.Y., for appellants.

Eliot F. Bloom, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order dated April 15, 2003, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, with costs, and upon reargument, the defendants' motion is granted unconditionally.

Under the totality of the circumstances, including, inter alia, the very brief delay on the part of the defendants before the plaintiff moved for a default judgment and the minimal culpability on the part of the defendants, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to condition the granting of the defendants' motion, inter alia, to vacate their default in answering the complaint upon their payment of the sum of $1,000 to the plaintiff ( see Island Seafood v. Anchor Fish Distribs., 269 A.D.2d 426).

SMITH, J.P., S. MILLER, ADAMS and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kapsis v. Peragine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 2004
8 A.D.3d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Kapsis v. Peragine

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. KAPSIS, respondent, v. MICHAEL S. PERAGINE, ET AL., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 297

Citing Cases

Travelers Cas. Sur. Co. v. Dynamic Painting Corp.

sel has averred that despite the prior discussions which had ensued, and the speaking relationship which he…