From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaplansky v. Assoc. Ymywha's of Greater N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1989
154 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 23, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bambrick, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the defendant's motion to change venue to New York County is granted, the plaintiff's cross motion is denied, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, is directed to forthwith deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, all papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries (see, CPLR 511 [d]).

The plaintiff improperly commenced this action in Queens County based on the allegation that the cause of action arose in that county. CPLR 503 (a) provides that "[e]xcept where otherwise prescribed by law, the place of trial shall be in the county in which one of the parties resided when [the action] was commenced". The complaint alleges that the plaintiff resides in Nassau County and that the defendant is a domestic corporation having its principal office in New York County (see, CPLR 503 [c]). In support of its motion to change venue, the defendant submitted its certificate of incorporation verifying the latter fact. Consequently, the plaintiff should have commenced this action in either Nassau County or New York County (see, Alverio v Delta Intl. Mach. Corp., 139 A.D.2d 419; West v West, 111 A.D.2d 632; Burch v Phillips, 88 A.D.2d 896; Bryan v Hagemann, 31 A.D.2d 905, 906), and the defendant's motion to change the venue to New York County should have been granted. Brown, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kaplansky v. Assoc. Ymywha's of Greater N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1989
154 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Kaplansky v. Assoc. Ymywha's of Greater N.Y

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN KAPLANSKY, Respondent, v. ASSOCIATED YMYWHA's OF GREATER NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
546 N.Y.S.2d 404

Citing Cases

Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Millennium Dev.

In general, under the CPLR, venue is based on the residence of the parties at the time of the commencement of…

Ledesma v. Kur

In general, under the CPLR, venue is based on the residence of the parties at the time of the commencement of…