From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaplan v. Hendricks

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 7, 2016
SC: 153621 (Mich. Dec. 7, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153621

12-07-2016

CHRISTOPHER KAPLAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NANCY HENDRICKS, f/k/a NANCY KAPLAN, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 325246
Alpena CC Family Division: 10-003705-DM

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 7, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Kaplan v. Hendricks

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 7, 2016
SC: 153621 (Mich. Dec. 7, 2016)
Case details for

Kaplan v. Hendricks

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER KAPLAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NANCY HENDRICKS, f/k/a NANCY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Dec 7, 2016

Citations

SC: 153621 (Mich. Dec. 7, 2016)