From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kantor v. the Perth Amboy Nat. Bank

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Apr 30, 1951
13 N.J. Super. 266 (App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

Argued March 12, 1951 —

Decided April 30, 1951.

On appeal from the New Jersey Courts, Law Division, Middlesex County.

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

Mr. Sol Kantor argued the cause pro se. Mr. John T. Keefe argued the cause for the appellants ( Mr. David T. Wilentz and Mr. Edmund A. Hayes, attorneys).


The principal question is whether a county board of elections may have a branch office away from the county seat. The Board of Chosen Freeholders of Middlesex County leased from the Perth Amboy National Bank a suite of offices in Perth Amboy for the use of the board of elections. At the suit of a taxpayer, the Law Division awarded summary judgment setting aside the lease and enjoining the occupation of the suite by the election board and payment of the rent accruing after December 31, 1950. The learned judge who heard the case concluded that R.S. 19:6-21 impliedly prohibited the leasing or occupation of offices outside of the county seat. That section directed that the county boards of elections be provided with an office "in the court house of the county for which they are respectively appointed, or in a building as near as possible adjacent thereto." After the judgment was rendered and the appeal taken, the Legislature, by the enactment of P.L. 1951, c. 10, amended R.S. 19:6-21 by striking out the part above quoted and by directing that there be provided an office "or offices." The clear intent and effect of the amendment is to authorize the freeholders to provide more than one office for the election board, and to remove any requirement that the office be at the county seat. The case is governed by the law now in force and not the law prevailing when the judgment was entered. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United Electrical, etc., 139 N.J. Eq. 97 ( E. A. 1946); Fusaro v. Reid, 2 N.J. Super. 107 ( App. Div. 1949); Binetti v. Swenson, 3 N.J. Super. 227 ( App. Div. 1949). In order to bring the decision into harmony with the new enactment, the judgment is reversed, but without costs to any party either here or in the Law Division.


Summaries of

Kantor v. the Perth Amboy Nat. Bank

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Apr 30, 1951
13 N.J. Super. 266 (App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Kantor v. the Perth Amboy Nat. Bank

Case Details

Full title:SOL KANTOR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE PERTH AMBOY NATIONAL BANK, AND…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Apr 30, 1951

Citations

13 N.J. Super. 266 (App. Div. 1951)
80 A.2d 446

Citing Cases

Becker v. Adams

In support of their appeal the plaintiffs advance the single contention that "having initiated a proceeding…