From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kansky v. Kansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1989
150 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

May 15, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the defendant's motion for a downward modification of the pendente lite award of maintenance and child support is granted to the extent of limiting the defendant's obligation to pay the carrying charges for the marital residence to the extent of paying the mortgage of $313 per month, reducing the amount of child support from $300 per week to $200 per week, and vacating the award of maintenance of $75 per week, effective as of April 8, 1988, the date the defendant's application was made, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a recalculation of any arrears.

Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (9) permits either party to apply for a modification of any order for maintenance and support upon a showing of a substantial change in circumstances. In this case, the undisputed evidence shows that within a few months after the original pendente lite award, the plaintiff wife obtained full-time employment at an annual salary nearly three times as much as her prior salary. Since the ability of the recipient spouse to be self-supporting is one of the many factors to be considered in awarding maintenance or child support, the court should have exercised its discretion to modify its original award (see, e.g., Bofford v Bofford, 117 A.D.2d 643, 646; Lipow v Lipow, 110 A.D.2d 756). Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kansky v. Kansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1989
150 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Kansky v. Kansky

Case Details

Full title:KAREN KANSKY, Respondent, v. ANDREW R. KANSKY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 15, 1989

Citations

150 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
541 N.Y.S.2d 117

Citing Cases

Stricos v. Stricos

However, since that time, plaintiff's earned annual income has almost tripled from $14,000 to $40,314. Giving…

Sasson v. Sasson

It is undisputed that the plaintiff wife has been gainfully employed since 1984 and, at that time, was…