From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kansas v. Carr

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 29, 2015
135 S. Ct. 2917 (2015)

Opinion

No. 14–450.

06-29-2015

KANSAS, petitioner, v. Reginald Dexter CARR, Jr.


Opinion

Upon consideration of the joint motion of respondents for scheduling of argument and for divided argument, and of the motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument in Nos. 14–449 and 14–450, the following allocation of oral argument time is adopted. A total of one hour is allocated for oral argument in No. 14–452, and on Question 1 in Nos. 14–449 and 14–450, to be divided as follows: 30 minutes for petitioner, 20 minutes for respondents Jonathan D. Carr and Sidney J. Gleason, and 10 minutes respondent Reginald D. Carr. A total of one hour is allocated for oral argument on Question 2 in Nos. 14–449, and 14–450, to be divided as follows: 20 minutes for petitioner, 10 minutes for the Solicitor General, 20 minutes for respondent Reginald D. Carr, and 10 minutes for respondent Jonathan D. Carr.


Summaries of

Kansas v. Carr

Supreme Court of the United States
Jun 29, 2015
135 S. Ct. 2917 (2015)
Case details for

Kansas v. Carr

Case Details

Full title:KANSAS, petitioner, v. Reginald Dexter CARR, Jr.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jun 29, 2015

Citations

135 S. Ct. 2917 (2015)
192 L. Ed. 2d 922
83 U.S.L.W. 3928