From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KANSAS CITY S. RLY. CO. v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENG

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division
Jun 26, 2006
05-3063 (C.D. Ill. Jun. 26, 2006)

Opinion

05-3063.

June 26, 2006


OPINION


On March 15, 2006, the Court allowed Defendant Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers Trainmen's summary judgment motion. See d/e 16. The Defendant moved the Court to amend the judgment by ordering statutory interest, attorney's fees, etc. See d/e 18. Plaintiff Kansas City Southern Railway Company opposed the Defendant's motion, arguing that the Court should merely affirm the decision of Arbitrator Benn.

The Defendant's requested relief exceeds the scope of Court's March 15, 2006, Opinion. That Opinion simply decided that Arbitrator Benn's decision was correct. It awarded no fees, interest, etc. Those issues were not before the Court; therefore, the March 15, 2006, Judgment should not be amended to include those items.

Ergo, the Court's March 15, 2006, Judgment (d/e 17) is correct as written. Defendant Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers Trainmen's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (d/e 18) is DENIED.

This case is CLOSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

KANSAS CITY S. RLY. CO. v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENG

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division
Jun 26, 2006
05-3063 (C.D. Ill. Jun. 26, 2006)
Case details for

KANSAS CITY S. RLY. CO. v. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENG

Case Details

Full title:KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BROTHERHOOD OF…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division

Date published: Jun 26, 2006

Citations

05-3063 (C.D. Ill. Jun. 26, 2006)