From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kanner v. Frumkes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 20, 1977
353 So. 2d 196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 77-798.

December 20, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, William A. Herin, J.

William J. Brown, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joseph W. Lawrence II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.


This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint for declaratory judgment seeking a determination of whether Section 286.011, Florida Statutes (1975), the Government in the Sunshine Law, is applicable to the Judicial Nominating Commission of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit.

" 286.011 Public meetings and records; public inspection; penalties
"(1) All meetings of any board or commission of any state agency or authority or of any agency or authority of any county, municipal corporation or any political subdivision, except as otherwise provided in the constitution, at which official acts are to be taken are declared to be public meetings open to the public at all times, and no resolution, rule, regulation or formal action shall be considered binding except as taken or made at such meeting."

The basic issue raised is whether the function of judicial nominating commissions is an executive one which cannot be limited by legislative act. We find this issue was resolved by our Supreme Court in In Re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 276 So.2d 25, 29-30 (Fla. 1973):

"[2] The appointment of a judge is an executive function and the screening of applicants which results in the nomination of those qualified is also an executive function. It is the prerogative of the Legislature to provide for the number of persons to serve on each judicial nominating commission and the method of their selection. Once the judicial nominating commissions have been established by the Legislature they become a part of the executive branch of government. The function of the commissions being inherently an executive function, such cannot be limited by legislative action."

Our Supreme Court further held in the case that the power and duty for promulgating rules of procedure for their hearings and findings (independent of any of the three standard recognized divisions of state government), must rest with the members of the commission. In re Advisory Opinion, supra, at 30-31.

The function of the judicial nominating commissions being executive in nature and the mandate therefor coming from the Florida Constitution, not from the legislature, the governor or the judiciary, it is clear that these commissions are not subject to Section 286.011, Florida Statutes (1975).

Article V, Section 11(d), Florida Constitution (1976).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kanner v. Frumkes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 20, 1977
353 So. 2d 196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Kanner v. Frumkes

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD KANNER, APPELLANT, v. MELVYN B. FRUMKES, AS CHAIRMAN, ELEVENTH…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 20, 1977

Citations

353 So. 2d 196 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Justice Coalition v. First Dis. C

See Fla. Dist. Ct. Jud. Nominating Comm'n R., § X. In the same vein, a court cannot, as requested by the…