From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kanitz v. Mangrum

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jan 16, 2013
2013-UP-032 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-032

01-16-2013

Lynn Marie Kanitz, Respondent. v. Neil Treavor Mangrum, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2011-194287

Neil Treavor Mangrum, of Greer, pro se. Lynn Marie Kanitz, of Greer, pro se.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted December 3, 2012

Appeal From Greenville County Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge.

Neil Treavor Mangrum, of Greer, pro se.

Lynn Marie Kanitz, of Greer, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:

1. As to whether the family court erred in finding Mangrum in contempt for violating a visitation provision in his divorce order: Argabright v. Argabright, 398 S.C. 176, 179, 727 S.E.2d 748, 750 (2012) (noting the standard of review in appeals from the family court is de novo); Hawkins v. Mullins, 359 S.C. 497, 501, 597 S.E.2d 897, 899 (Ct. App. 2004) ("A party may be found in contempt of court for the willful violation of a lawful court order.").

2. As to whether the family court erred in finding Mangrum in contempt for violating a restraining order against confrontation and harassment of the other party in the presence of their minor child: Argabright, 398 S.C. at 179, 727 S.E.2d at 750 (noting the standard of review in appeals from the family court is de novo); Hawkins, 359 S.C. at 501, 597 S.E.2d at 899 ("A party may be found in contempt of court for the willful violation of a lawful court order.").

3. As to whether the family court erred in awarding Kanitz attorney's fees: Chisholm v. Chisholm, 396 S.C. 507, 510, 722 S.E.2d 222, 223 (2012) (stating an appellate court reviews the family court's grant of attorney's fees de novo); Miller v. Miller, 375 S.C. 443, 463, 652 S.E.2d 754, 764 (Ct. App. 2007) ("Courts, by exercising their contempt power, can award attorney's fees under a compensatory contempt theory.").

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J, and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

Kanitz v. Mangrum

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jan 16, 2013
2013-UP-032 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Kanitz v. Mangrum

Case Details

Full title:Lynn Marie Kanitz, Respondent. v. Neil Treavor Mangrum, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 16, 2013

Citations

2013-UP-032 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 2013)