holding that where court grants motion to dismiss as to one defendant, court may dismiss claims against non-moving or non-appearing defendants who are "in a position similar to that of moving defendants"
Summary of this case from Perkumpulan Investor Crisis Ctr. Dressel-WBG v. WongNo. 81-246.
October 13, 1981.
Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 227 Ct. Cl. 458, 650 F. 2d 264.
holding that where court grants motion to dismiss as to one defendant, court may dismiss claims against non-moving or non-appearing defendants who are "in a position similar to that of moving defendants"
Summary of this case from Perkumpulan Investor Crisis Ctr. Dressel-WBG v. Wongholding district court may sua sponte dismiss action as to defendant who has not appeared, where such defendant is "in a position similar to that of moving defendants"
Summary of this case from Theofel v. Farey-Jonesconcluding that the Court may properly "dismiss an action as to defendants who have not moved to dismiss where such defendants are in a position similar to that of moving defendants or where claims against such defendants are integrally related."
Summary of this case from SEGO v. MOLENAARgranting defendant's motion for summary judgment based on insufficiency of plaintiffs' damage evidence
Summary of this case from Southern Pac. Com. Co. v. American Tel. Tel.Full title:KANIA v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 13, 1981
Accordingly, the above-titled action is hereby DISMISSED with respect to Kwasny. See Silverton v. Department…
Southern Pac. Com. Co. v. American Tel. Tel.hese assumptions is fatal not only to the damage claim, but to plaintiffs' entire case. See, e.g., Herman…