From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kanger v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 7, 2011
No. 07-CV-8094-PCT-PGR (MHB) (D. Ariz. Nov. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. 07-CV-8094-PCT-PGR (MHB)

11-07-2011

Kenneth James Kanger, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et. al., Respondents.


ORDER

On September 19, 2011, the Court denied Petitioner's Motion for Relief from a Judgment/Order under Rule 60(b) on the grounds that the motion constituted a second or successive petition and was untimely. (Doc. 97.) On November 4, 2011, the Court of Appeals remanded the case "for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability" under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). (Doc. 105.)

Accordingly,

IT IS HERE BY ORDERED DENYING a certificate of appealability. The Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court forward this Order and the case record to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's letter for extension of time to appeal (Doc. 99), which the Court has construed as a motion, is denied as moot.

Paul G. Rosenblatt

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kanger v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 7, 2011
No. 07-CV-8094-PCT-PGR (MHB) (D. Ariz. Nov. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Kanger v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth James Kanger, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et. al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Nov 7, 2011

Citations

No. 07-CV-8094-PCT-PGR (MHB) (D. Ariz. Nov. 7, 2011)