From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kang v. Hybrid Trade Ltd.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 27, 2022
2:21-cv-06593-MCS-JPR (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-06593-MCS-JPR

04-27-2022

BRIAN KANG, an individual, on behalf of himself and SKYBLOCK, LLC and MID-WILSHRE CONSULTING LLC, PRASAD HURRA, DAVID KIM, an individual, on behalf of himself and BLUE BLOCK GROUP, ARTEMIO VERDUZO, DAVID KWON, and YOUNG JAE KWON, Plaintiffs, v. HYBRID TRADE LIMITED, ASIA DIGITAL ASSET EXCHANGE, ALLYSIAN SCIENCES, APOLO OHNO, ROD JAO, EUGENIO PUGLIESE, HENRY LIU, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.


AMENDED JUDGMENT

MARK C. SCARSI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to this Court's Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, IT IS ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Hybrid Trade Limited, Asia Digital Asset Exchange, Allysian Sciences, Apolo Ohno, Rod Jao, Eugenio Pugliese, and Henry Liu and against Plaintiffs Brian Kang, Prasad Hurra, David Kim, Artemio Verduzo, David Kwon, and Young Jae Kwon on claims one, two, three, four, and five in Plaintiffs' Complaint. The Court dismisses claims one, two, three, four, and five, the federal law securities claims, with prejudice. The Court dismisses claims six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, and fifteen, the state law claims, without prejudice. Plaintiffs shall take nothing from this action, and Defendants are entitled to their costs of suit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kang v. Hybrid Trade Ltd.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 27, 2022
2:21-cv-06593-MCS-JPR (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Kang v. Hybrid Trade Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN KANG, an individual, on behalf of himself and SKYBLOCK, LLC and…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 27, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-06593-MCS-JPR (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2022)