From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kamilche Co. v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 5, 1996
75 F.3d 1391 (9th Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 93-15768.

Decided February 5, 1996.

D.C. No. CV-91-00476-CAL

Before: GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The opinion cited at 53 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. May 8, 1995), is hereby amended as follows:

At 53 F.3d 1064, before the word "REVERSED," the following paragraph is added:

In its petition for rehearing, the government reminds us that Simpson received a benefit in the amount of $300,000.00 as part of the transaction in which it disclaimed its interest and contests whether donative intent has been established to that extent. If the fair market value of the donated property exceeds the value of the property received in return, the taxpayer has the requisite donative intent for the excess value conveyed. United States v. American Bar Endowment, 477 U.S. 105, 118 (1986). Simpson concedes, and we so hold, that its tax deduction must be reduced to that extent, i.e. to $13,800,000.00, based on the stipulated record.

Except as granted to the above extent, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.


Summaries of

Kamilche Co. v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 5, 1996
75 F.3d 1391 (9th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

Kamilche Co. v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:KAMILCHE COMPANY; SIMPSON REDWOOD CO., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 5, 1996

Citations

75 F.3d 1391 (9th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Yellowowl-Burdeau v. City of Tukwila

(4) how closely related are the claims involved in the two proceedings?Kamilche Co. v. United States, 53 F.3d…

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Keating

The RTC, as the party asserting issue preclusion, must show that the estopped issues are identical to issues…