From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kamau v. Slate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
May 6, 2013
CASE NO. 4:11cv522-RH/CAS (N.D. Fla. May. 6, 2013)

Summary

adopting recommendation of dismissal where plaintiffs failed to respond with any facts which address whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Cope v. Hancock

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:11cv522-RH/CAS

05-06-2013

CIOP KAMAU and TYRA RASMUS, Plaintiffs, v. GREGORY ALAN SLATE et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge's second report and recommendation, ECF No. 72, and the response, ECF No. 73. The bottom line is this: the defendants have moved to dismiss, and the plaintiffs have acquiesced. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. The clerk must enter judgment stating, "All claims are dismissed without prejudice." The clerk must close the file.

Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kamau v. Slate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
May 6, 2013
CASE NO. 4:11cv522-RH/CAS (N.D. Fla. May. 6, 2013)

adopting recommendation of dismissal where plaintiffs failed to respond with any facts which address whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Cope v. Hancock
Case details for

Kamau v. Slate

Case Details

Full title:CIOP KAMAU and TYRA RASMUS, Plaintiffs, v. GREGORY ALAN SLATE et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 4:11cv522-RH/CAS (N.D. Fla. May. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

Cope v. Hancock

Therefore, the Court will dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See, e.g., Kamau v.…